Guide
Searching and asking questions across a whole case
The fact you need is somewhere in forty hours of audio, ten thousand messages, and a banker's box of PDFs. Finding it should take seconds, and every answer should cite its source.
The hard part of a document-heavy case isn't that the evidence is missing — it's that it's buried. The decisive admission is in a call from March; the contradicting figure is in a statement you skimmed weeks ago. Keyword search alone misses it, because people don't say the words you search for. What you want is to ask in plain language and get pointed straight to the passage — with a citation you can verify.
Keyword search vs semantic search
Keyword search finds the literal string. But a witness who "moved money to his brother" won't have written "fraudulent transfer." Semantic search matches on meaning, so a query about hiding assets surfaces the passage about the quiet transfer even though the words differ. For investigative work across messy, real-world language, that difference is everything.
Asking questions — with citations, not vibes
Beyond search, you can ask questions of the case — "what did he say about the account?" — and get a grounded answer assembled from the actual evidence. The non-negotiable feature is citation: every answer must point to the specific recording, message, or document it came from, so you verify it rather than trust it. An answer you can't trace is a lead at best and a liability at worst — the same discipline we wrote about in making evidence verifiable.
An answer without a citation isn't evidence — it's a rumor with good grammar. Always click through to the source.
One case, one search box
The real unlock is that everything lives together. Recordings, transcripts, text messages, photos, financial records — all in one searchable case. A single query runs across all of it, so "every mention of the boat" returns the voicemail, the text, and the line in the bank statement at once, instead of three separate hunts.
How Scribe handles this
In Scribe Verbatim, every recording is transcribed and every document and message indexed, so the whole case is searchable by meaning, not just keywords. Ask a question and get an answer drawn from the evidence with citations to the exact source — transcript line, message, or page — that you click through to confirm. You still do the lawyering; Scribe just makes sure the relevant passage is never more than a search away, and always tied to where it came from.
Frequently asked
How is semantic search different from Ctrl-F?
Keyword search matches exact words; semantic search matches meaning. It finds the passage about an idea even when the words differ from your query — essential when people don't use the terms you'd search for.
Can I trust the answers to questions?
Trust, but verify. Scribe grounds answers in your case's evidence and cites the exact source for each, so you click through and confirm rather than taking the answer on faith.
Does it search across different kinds of evidence at once?
Yes — recordings, transcripts, messages, photos, and documents live in one case and are searched together.